Big Tits: Is Showing Less Sometimes MORE?
Ashley Sage is showing zero cleavage, tit or areolae in this shot and it's STILL hot.
When a woman has a big set of tits and she is wearing a low-cut top, or showing off a lot of cleavage, you LOOK. I mean, we discussed this in my blog about “The Decision.” A set of nice tits that are blatantly out there for you to look at, well, they are there for you to LOOK at. It’s hot. It’s provocative. It’s definitely meant to push your buttons. A chick WANTS you to look.
But what about when a chick shows nada, zilch, zero?
What if the only indication of a woman’s breasts is the silhouette of her body and that’s it?
Is showing less sometimes more?
I mean, take a look at Ashley Sage to the left. Her upper body? It’s completely covered up. Not one bit of tit flesh for your eyes to roam over, but yet, there is a fucking hotness about that shot. Just the imprint of her mountainous hooters is promise enough.
I think so.
Is showing less really more?
I looked through a hundred big-tit shots today of models pulling their nipples, lifting their breasts up, jumping, squeezing their boobs together, oiling them…and this shot of Ashley in that sweater kept calling my attention.
Is it because I see tits all day and this covered-up shot is now NOT the norm, therefore more provocative? Maybe. But maybe not. I think that if we were to post this shot on a billboard visible from a crowded street that most people would see it and say, “Holy crap! That chick has massive tits!” or, “Look at her boobs!” Even though she is totally covered up.
Granted, Ashley Sage is a full 36J and those gunboats are stuffed into this thin, white sweater. So maybe this kind of shot only works with a chick with massive hooters? Is that the magic behind this?
Would you look at this shot, would it call your attention if her tits were DD-cup instead?
Once again, I think so. I think that the silhouette of a nice pair of tits is just as powerful as the Full Monty.
What do you think? Is less sometimes more? Chime in.
xoxo
Maria
Tags: Ashley Sage, Ashley Sage Ellision, boob silhoutte, covered up tits, Sweater Stretchers, tits in sweaters, tits in tight tops
Categories: Life With Big Tits, Poll, Tits in Tight Tops
@JJ Fuck yeah man!!
DAMN. I’d love to rub my cock all over that sweater and her clothed tits until I ruined it for good!
@LeeRoy: Probably somewhere around zero. Or maybe in the negatives.
Yep clothes are hot!!! nothing better than a pictorial or vid of a model FULLY dressed for what ever the occasion before stripping off!
TO ME THE COVER OF SCORE/VOLUPTOUS/XL-GIRLS IS ALWAYS THE HIGHLIGHT DUE TO THE MODEL COVERING UP
hey simon long time no hear how are you?????
Less is definitely sometimes more . I love the photos of Dors Feline and Terri Jane in their pink and red mini dresses ( are they dresses ?!!! ) in the advert for V-mag . Just wonderful curves and a hint of cleavage , such a sexy photo .
@A. : good points!
@Winter1968: TY! š
heya C.A.! You can see them in the June ’09 issue of SCORE. š
You put that shot on a billboad you will have plenty of accidents and the little gecko would be busy for about a month underwriting the claims. Sometimes less is more. Especially in an indoor setting or during winter.
I can appreciate tight, non-revealing attire. But, let’s face it, we come to TSG for primarily one reason, and that is to see skin. The more the better. Don’t get me wrong. I love turtle necks, sweaters, and dress shirts on models, but only for effect. I mean, if they’re doing a librarian, or a teacher, or an executive type of fantasy, that is fantastic, a couple of shots with their tight blouses showing their wonderful volume is awesome. But then all must come off. Yes, fully clothed pictorials can be sexy (and I do like them), but, again, that’s not the reason why we come to TSG.
Hellz yes!
what are the odds that Ashley Sage will do HC in the future?
havent seen these pics before Maria,they werent in score so what v-mag issue are they from please???? big tits in sweaters are great,Crystal Gunns score feb08 sweater shoot is amazing….
less can at times be more Maria, this pic is a great example,not much to see but the promise that a huge set of tits are there to be fucked and sucked is all thats needed…… anyone can see she has massive boobs from this shot even someone who isnt a titman but the less is more aspect to a true titman like me has massive appeal…. would it look as good with a dd-cup??? yes it would still get my full attention but Ashley makes this dream work just right …. DD cup is nice and i sure wouldnt be complaining if i was sucking them or had my pole between them but for me i like my titties on an E-cup and upwards…..
Maria, again, you are my favorite writer; or more likely, you write in such a way that I like and, about topics that dominate my thoughts and inspire my blog and Scorecard submissions. In my world, I am in complete agreement about your assertions here…and in your “Decision” piece as well. Your choice of Ashley Sage in the representative image is pure perfection. I DO think less is more and a gorgeous lady with very large breasts, who shows little to no cleavage, has my mystery and imagination buttons pushed majorly. I am entranced by the lines and shape of Super Curvy and my imagination jettisons into a nether world. Ashley Sage is breathtakingly gorgeous and to see her in person would make my heart stop, and I would be so keen to try and speak with her just to be in proximity to her statuesquenessā¦.and that goes for MANY TSG models. Your choice of words, āIndication and silhouette of her body,ā are the evaluative words based in artistic appraisal. I agree with these words because this is what everyday people such as me see in a lady out on the streetsā¦the lines of her curvesā¦and in this case, her Super Curves. The mountainous shape of beautiful mammoth breasts hidden and contained behind a bra and sweater or blouse will stop me like nothing else. It will, and does, own me. I too have seen many full reveals so there is often more sex appeal in what I am not allowed to yet seeā¦.such as Ashley wrapped in a beautiful sweater. Itās the suggestion of shapely lines, and less reveal that heightens the attraction, imagination and mystery. To further the point, I am a diehard fan of seeing a model walk so I can see the breast movement of subtle bounce, jiggle or swing, or the side to side gentle breast sway such as Dors Feline in āTropic of Tease,ā it is beyond hot to me. To see Ashley walking around in a natural setting with the camera poised to document all her body English and particularly breast movement is the shit to me. I fucking love this topic and what you have said about it Maria.
You’re totally right Maria, a woman thats fully dressed in clothes is so much hotter looking than someone who just starts off naked or with very little clothes. Don’t get me wrong, I love seeing a woman naked, but I like it when its done right . And this might surprise you, but I hate when women at score jump up and down,grab at their breats , or shake their breasts for the camera, because guys supposedly like that, I don’t. I don’t like it when it’s “artificially” done, I like when it happens naturally, for example, when they are taking off teir clothes or doing something which results in subtle movements which make their breasts jiggle, thats as hot as it gets for me. Also, I hate how some women at score grab their breasts in such a rough manner,I hear that women want men to be gentle with their breasts, but for some reason I see women in porn just grab at their breasts like an over zealous guy would do, I guess thats what they think guys want to see. But no, what i want to see is women touch themselves the way they want to be touched.