Is Victoria Lane a SCORE Girl?
Victoria Lane is a great V-Girl, but does she belong in SCORE, too?
Every month, the editors of SCORE (me, Elliot, John Fox, etc.) make the most important decision ever made in adult magazine publishing: Which girls are going to be in that particular issue of the magazine. In fact, we met earlier today and discussed just that. And, once again, for maybe the upteenth time, we considered Victoria Lane for SCORE and decided, “She’s great. She’s a perfect Voluptuous model. But she isn’t a SCORE Girl.”
This is a painful decision for us because we love Victoria. I mean, just look at the girl. She’s super-curvy. She has G-cup naturals and a sexy face. But her measurements are 42-32-42, and that middle number–32–is one that doesn’t show up in SCORE too often. There have been times, such as recently with Renee Ross and Ashley Sage Ellison, when we pushed the envelope. Some of you were okay with that. But most of our readers responded with something along the lines of, “She’s great, but she doesn’t belong in SCORE.” One reader recently suggested that no model with a waist measurement of more than 30 inches should be allowed in SCORE. Okay, but we try not to base our decisions solely on numbers.
But we’re very careful about who goes into SCORE and who goes into V-Mag. We don’t want V-Mag to be the naturals-only version of SCORE. We don’t want SCORE to be a magazine for all girls with big tits.
Now, SCORELAND members don’t have to worry about this distinction because they get the girls from both magazines. But put on your editors cap for a second and tell us what you think: Should Victoria Lane go into SCORE?
Tags: Ashley Sage Ellison, natural tits, Renee Ross, SCORE, Victoria Lane, Voluptuous
Categories: Behind the Scenes, New at Scoreland, The Life of an Editor
More thighs, more knees more squatting who cares about tits!
The BEST JUISY GIRL!!!
Juicy Baby!!! The BEST
yes, she is one of the best i have seen on this site!
Victoria is a beautiful full figured woman which should qualify her for Score. Girls with big boobs & curves, awesome, Girls with big boobs that are skinny with flat ass’s have only one asset. Example, Minka – skinny and boobs that have gone way beyond looking good. I will take any woman with big boobs & curves any day which shold qualify them for Score. Plumbers are differant and should stay in “XL Girls”.
Victoria is the most beautiful model I have ever seen. Frankly, I dont care which magazine or website shes featured on as long as the updates keep coming (Speaking of which I wouldnt mind a few more soon). That being said I think it might be nice to give it a shot and see how SCORE readers respond. Selfishly speaking, I’d hope it would bring more followers so there’s much more content featuring her
The answer to your question is…ABSOLUTELY NOT.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with Victoria Lane. She’s got gerat tits, but the plain fact is that she’s kinda fat. SCORE is supposed to be for models who are thin or at leats average. If you start putting bigger girls into the magazine, then the line between SCORE and Voluptuous just gets blurred even more. You need to set a standard and not allow those lines to be crossed. They’re not the same magazine, but they are becoming that way, something that will only be further enforced if Miss Lane makes it into SCORE. She is clearly a V-Mag girl and just as clearly NOT a SCORE girl.
TL
PS, to all of you that said no…….. I think you have gay tendencies….A REAL SEXY BROAD HAS CURVES!!!!! I’m into pussy n tits but if a broad is a sparrow’s knee cap, 90 lbs, I won’t even look at her ……ew!!!!
Yes, she should go in score… she’s not fat! and you shouldn’t put any rolley pics in voluptuous if the model is capable of making non-rolley pics for SCORE which look much nicer…nobody likes rolls * AHEM* COUGH COUGH…….sorry…frog in my throat….
Late to this post, but I did want to weigh in. I don’t give a flip where you categorize the lovely Victoria Lane. I just want to see more of her. She has a phenomenal body, a gorgeous face, and the best smile (when she uses it). I say again, I just want to see more of her.
Will it be new footage of Alix?
Respecfully,
Sean
Brand new.
Dave as a member of scoreland for a while now I was wondering could you done a blog post for Alix Lakehurst like you did for Victoria Lane? there is just something majestic about Alix but not to give Victoria here props as well,put them together in a pictorial or video and you would have two of the best women in vmag history.
Sean: Alix was back in our studio recently, and she’s part of a new XXX movie coming out soon.
In my humble opinion, she’s more of a Score girl than V-mag, but since i’m a little split, having subscriptions to both.. As long as she’s in one of the mags, it’s good
Score is slim and stacked. I don’t understand the dilemma. Thicker and curvier models have V-mag. We wouldn’t be asking for an F-150 truck to be featured in an exotic sports car magazine would we? There are mags for the truck aficionados.
think she is voluptous not score, very cute and sexy though
FrankNZ asks, “What exactly are your criteria for SCORE and Voluptuous models anyway? The cover of Voluptuous proudly proclaims “All Stacked – All Natural”, but I’m not sure what the catchphrase for SCORE is. “Big Tits – Not Necessarily Natural”?
Voluptuous: Naturally stacked girls who tend to be curvy. Cherry Brady and Victoria Lane are perfect V-Girls. So is Karina Hart. They have some meat on their bones. Merilyn Sakova has been in V-Mag, but I wouldn’t call her the perfect V-Girl, although her tits are great. Girls on the bigger side (overall body) go into XL Girls, but V-Mag and XL Girls go on the XLGirls.com website (which is meant for girls in both mags).
SCORE: Slim ‘n’ stacked is the ideal. Girls like Merilyn Sakova and Linsey. Morgan Leigh, Crystal Gunns, etc. Karla James is excellent (and I’d really like to measure her personally to check on that 30-inch waist; I think she’s smaller. Natural or augmented.
Basically, though, we know a V-Girl when we see one and we know a SCORE Girl when we see one (as do our readers/members). Do we occasionally blur the line? Yes, but hopefully, not too often. And it is possible for a SCORE Girl to be a V-Girl and vice-versa.
Admittedly, there are times we put a V-Girl in SCORE just because we think readers would love to see her tits. The other way around sometimes, too.–Dave
Yeah I would say Victoria belongs more in SCORE than Renee Ross does but that just my 2cents, but with that said, I agree with Cool Rick. Many VO Models are on that fine life between SCORE and VO. And can go either way…..no pun intended…lie….it was intended
yes…..Victoria is a big girl, but she’s hardly a “plumper”; putting
her in SCORE would be appropriate.
who give a shit SHE’S HOT!!!!
Wow, she is smokin hot! Put her anywhere u want and I’ll looks at her…..she’s a stone fox!
Victoria’s hourglass figure is perfect, so as far as I’m concerned you can feature her as a cover girl for SCORE, Voluptuous and XL Girls!
What exactly are your criteria for SCORE and Voluptuous models anyway? The cover of Voluptuous proudly proclaims “All Stacked – All Natural”, but I’m not sure what the catchphrase for SCORE is. “Big Tits – Not Necessarily Natural”?
I’m glad to hear that waist size isn’t your key criterion. If you strictly apply that 30″ rule, Karla James would not make it into SCORE and Karina Hart would not be seen in Voluptuous. Crazy stuff.
What a dilemma! I can see both sides of the argument, and can see how tough a call it is to make. I mean I have, and I will jack lovingly to Victoria, but trying to think without “Mr Happy” having a vote… I think the best answer I can come up with is if you have space in Score, and no one is as cute as she is, sure, then run her. Esp if glammed up, as I also consider Score the place for dancers and glamourous layouts. If you have her in a cute track suit layout, or baking a pie, then leave that for Voluptuous.
And as always, if any model wants a bridal set, just send ’em over to my house and I’ll take care of them…
Victoria is definitely a SCORE girl. I think people get too hung up on labels. Where a model belongs shouldn’t be determined solely on body type. Now if SCORE was titled “slim and stacked”, then I could understand there having to be some sort of criteria, but when your banner says “#1 in Big Boobs”, that means you want to present the BEST boobs out there, not just boobs that are on a slender body. Now because Voluptuous says “All Stacked All Natural”, you are clearly stating that artificial enhancement isn’t allowed.
So while I understand that others want SCORE and VOLUPTUOUS to be two distinct/different magazines, I think it goes against your mission statement of #1 in Big Boobs to exclude a model from the pages just because she has a great rack but is a little curvier.
I say yes, she looks great!!
She is one of those perfect women who reside right on the line between both magazine requirements. I say she most definitely qualifies for Score magazine!
hell yea she would rock plus i could watch her all the time
I say…YES!! Victoria is fantastic. PRetty face and amazing body. You should devout a monthly mag just to her!
I think the Score-editors made the wrong decision regarding Victoria Lane!
How Renee Ross can be a Score girl (dec 2009) and not Victoria Lane ?? I don’t get it. They are both super-curvy, with G-cup naturals and a sexy face.
Hells yes! She great. Her waist is delicious
To answer the question simply: NO!
I don’t mean to sound prejudice, but my V-Mag girls need to be in V-Mag ONLY! In my opinion, Ashley Sage and Renee Ross never had any business being in Score themselves. Voluptuous girls belong in V-Mag, period, end of sentence. Just based on the comments you say that you receive alone, Score readers don’t appreciate our voluptuous or chubbier V-Mag girls. I feel like V-Mag aims to please one group, while Score aims to please another group. I don’t think that these two groups should be combined under any circumstances. I say when you get a model, you should initially decide which magazine you want to put her in. Then, keep her in that magazine only. Seeing all these models pop up in both just doesn’t make much sense to me. I understand maybe if her measurements change drastically or something, then she can switch over. But otherwise, I want to keep my voluptuous girls in V-Mag…especially Ms. Victoria Lane up there!!
Sorry for sounding like I was ranting, but I feel so strongly about these women being in BOTH publications.