A hard topic about breasts and hardcore scenes

October 6, 2015 by Elliot James 24 Comments

The SCORELAND Blog is a good platform for the topic I’m going to throw out here.

For years, there’s been a debate, on various forums among hardcore porn super-consumers, the guys who watch tons of the stuff like other people watch sports, about the differences on-screen between European porn girls and their American and British counterparts. Who’s hotter? Who’s natural and who’s mechanical in their scenes? Who’s more attractive, better at hardcore and better built? Who’s more high-energy or, on the flip side, approaching coma levels? This debate never seems to end and probably never will.

But this Blog won’t be about that.

In the SCORE universe, the girls with enhanced breasts seem more interested in doing hardcore porn than the natural-breasted girls. Or they may seem more interested because they often do hardcore from the start instead of waiting and returning to try it.

Sheridan Love, Tigerr Benson, Amy Anderssen, Alyssa Lynn, Sandra Star, Claudia Marie, Brook Ultra, Holly Brooks, Claudia KeAloha, Nadia Villanova, Bridgette B., Sharon Pink, Mischel Lee, Cathy Heaven, Patty Michova, Jenna Jayden, Lolly Ink, Barbie Kelley, Red Vixen, Marta La Croft, Harmony Reigns, Angelina Castro, Annelise Croft, Jordan Pryce, Mia Khalifa/Callista, Savannah Stevens and Demmi Valentine do hardcore.

Naturals that do hardcore are as great at sex on-camera as the enhanced girls, but the natural numbers are still behind.

Naturals who do hardcore: Liza Biggs, Maserati, Cat Bangles, Sirale, Elle Flynn, Anastasia Lux, Roxi Red, Katarina Dubrova, Cameron Skye, Maggie Green, Alana Lace, Krystal Swift, Harlow Nyx, Chloe Rose, Veronika, Marie Leone, Barbara Angel, Emilia Boshe and Cassie Cute.

So why this difference between naturals and augmented girls in the hardcore world? And does a breast connection even exist? It may not. Some girls get boob jobs because they want to become porn stars or models. During the early years of SCORE, girls got boob jobs and became dancers then moved into hardcore.

So the question is, why are there more augmented girls in hardcore than the naturals?

Thoughts?

Mia Khalifa (formerly Mia Callista)

Alana Lace

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 4.5/5
A hard topic about breasts and hardcore scenes, 4.5 out of 5 based on 2 ratings

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: , , ,

24 Comments

  • Rooster9

    I prefer natural. First girl I had sex with had huge naturals and I loved it. Enhanced is fine too as long as they are not ridiculously big. On the natural side, what about Daylene Rio?

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • bosomboy

    It’s strictly about attitude and outlook on life Elliot. I, for one, am a fake-torps guy. These babes who get bolt-ons know what they’ve got and they want to show them off not only on a visual level but on an “action” level. Particularly the mega-bouldered ones. It’s not just the “look”, but its the movement…and in hardcore, they are most-def moving. I think it’s a combination of that, plus their (much loved by me) desire to have those tits and make a complete career out of those tits.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Harry

    Naturals are more prude, imo.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • trent

    what happened to alana lace, where is she??

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • cvn

    There are probably as many answers to this as there are models who appear in Scoreland videos, but generally speaking, perhaps you alluded to the reason yourself, Elliot.

    You mentioned that in the early days of Score, when so many of the models were dancers, that many would get breast augmentation for the sake of their work in clubs and then gravitate to hardcore. Perhaps getting a boob job now is an indication of a model’s intent on making her mark in the adult industry, on some level.

    Maybe you can tell us, Elliot, as an expert in the field: is there a difference in the recruitment to Scoreland of augmented and natural models? Are the augmented models more likely to have sought you out, their interest in being in the adult industry already established, whereas are the natural models more likely to have been courted to pose? I’m speaking in completely general terms, of course, but if any of this is truly the case, it might explain why the augmented models might be more at ease with taking the next step . . .

    It’s an interesting speculation, but you can look at it from different perspective. If we’re talking about women who are similarly stacked, that would mean that the naturally-blessed women are also more voluptuous all around. So perhaps the question really is are big, beautiful models less inclined to do hardcore than their slimmer and surgically augmented counterparts?

    Doesn’t really matter, thought . . . I love ’em all!

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Elliot James

    “Is there a difference in the recruitment to Scoreland of augmented and natural models?”

    CVN, There’s no difference in finding models of both types. We have the magazine ads, BeASCOREModel.com, various ads on modeling job sites, word of mouth, licensed talent agents, spouses or friends’ suggestions, photographers’ recommendations, the free magazines given away in strip clubs, other models recommending us, social networks, and several other methods. Then there was the “busty girl who worked at the hamburger joint,” Mia Khalifa. That was just total happenstance and the Blog readers went along for the ride with Dave’s reports. I’ve actually had the worst luck in strip clubs. The dancers tend to think you’re pulling their leg, so to speak, as well as the staff (managers, DJ’s etc.).

    VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Chris C

    Interesting question! Maybe the enhanced women feel more committed or fitted to the hardcore world more so than “innocent” looking non-enhanced talent. Also, possibly girls starting out may not have funds for enhancement added to a reluctance (for myriad factors) to do hardcore right away, or ever perhaps. More mature talent may have the fortune of enhanced breasts but also less selective work in non-hardcore arenas. Either way, damn I love tits.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • maverick

    Dear Elliot,

    Naturally endowed and god blessed big breasted women beat these implanted silicone chicks ten to one, and they enjoy sex on camera with far more involvement and passion. That’s my fair take. Consider for example… Sara of the Czech Republic featured on the XLGirls. com website, a few months ago. Sara did six hardcore scenes in the time she was featured (solo acts were not even half that number !!) and she sets my cock ablaze even today. The first scene Sara did with George Pascal was amazing and the best hardcore scene i have ever seen in more than a decade of being a loyal member… We NEED MORE OF that and LESS OF the fake boob stuff….
    I would be happy and glad if Score Group as a whole puts in lot MORE effort and RENEWED focus to bring in MORE “naturally endowed women” as part of their content. Bring back girls like Kamryn Monroe, Addison Bound,Dulcinea, Scarlett Monroe and Olivia Jackson.
    If new natural talent and the existing identified talent are convinced to go all the way, we members will be thrilled and pleased as punch !!

    Cheers..Maverick.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Titlover

    I think, it’s about attitude, generally speaking. While natural breasts are gift, on the other hand enhanced ones are choice.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sam

    Yeah, fakes are outnumbering naturals but i dont care, naturals are the best.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sean B

    It would seem the general concensus would be that more “augmented” girls are more than willing than their natural counterparts. Maybe it is because, going in for a couple of bolt-ons, comes with a certain idea that people are going to notice their tits are bigger. With that confidence, I would think that would definitely be a factor. Not saying natural girls don’t have the same confidence because there are clearly exceptions.

    I’m more so convinced it isn’t exactly a boobs thing as much as it is a character thing. Most women who have their own opinions about sex tend to go by that. So if they’re okay with sex, comfortable in their own body or just love sex and don’t care about others opinions, they can go for Hard core and have very little reservations, tit jobs or natural.

    Either way, boobs are awesome, natural or not.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Moe

    I’m very happy with that because women with implants looks so much sexier, fake is the best! I rarely like girls with natural tits.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • sean

    Very good question!!! I think a lot of it has to do with what the girl is like as a person. You tend to find girls who like to enhance themselves are quite liberal sexually and generally want to have a good time. You often find that they like to flaunt their sexuality quite a bit so maybe it’s down to attitude. You do tend to find natural girls can be quite shy and introverted when it comes to modelling and hardcore specifically.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jorge

    Call it whatever you want but the natural girls have a natural advantage. They sell their looks more than they sell acting.
    The augmented pornstar, and even the smaller breasted pornstar have to sell their acting more and thus on average do hardcore more. Augmented girls not just do hardcore more often but also do more hardcore things such as anal. Take that list of natural girls who do hardcore and then filter the ones who do things like anal and you will see that number be ever smaller.
    Natural girls however can prolong stuff in their careers when it comes to hardcore. Fans anticipate things like first boy/girl, first anal, first dp, first gangbang and bukkake. Not all natural pornstars venture far with the “firsts” but where in their case those things can be exciting to wait for, for the augmented girls many of those firsts are expected.

    One final personal note. I do love how many natural girls that do hardcore take the cumshot on their tits. The smaller girl who couldn’t swallow invented the facial. It’s great and all. But it’s just something different I appreciate about big natural tits when they get a glaze of cum over them as the shake around. Not all big natural girls avoid facials especially since it’s easy to sit their with eyes closed. Then for those fans that prefer the facial, the times a natural babe does take one to the face it’s like one of those rare hardcore moments again.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • cvn

    Okay, Elliot, here’s another consideration: I’ve noticed that just about every model on the 40Something site, and EVERY model at the 50Something and 60Something sites, does hardcore (perhaps not every model of all time, but seemingly currently). Do you think that this is a reflection of life experience making those models more inclined to perform with a partner, or is that a prerequisite for a model posing for one of those sites?

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Elliot James

    It’s not a prerequisite. They are women who have either lived a very sexual life although there are some who didn’t and they are making up for lost time. So it’s life experience, in my opinion, and they’re cutting loose by doing porn and other forms of sexual experimentation. Many have been married, some several times, have kids, sometimes grandkids. Many are swingers. Some go to nudist camps or island resorts like Hedonism. As mature-lady porn becomes more mainstream–there have been TV reality shows about them– the numbers will only increase.

    VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mk1

    “Maybe one day”. in other words; keep dreaming… yeah, i’m not excited anymore. solo/gg is just not for me. damn it, why all the mega-amazing naturals always have to be so shy?! at least for a very LONG period of time until a tiny fraction of them decides to go hardcore. it’s like an unspoken law! it’s Science!

    by Obi1 on Oct 14, 2015 at 12:02 am

    This is a post from another blog entry, about newcomer Allie Pearson. A very good observations, IMO. The more the girl is bustier (natural, not augmented), the more unlikely is to see her doing anything rather than boring things, solos, lez stuff…let us name this a Natural law.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jon

    Speaking of naturally stacked girls that have done hardcore, I thought I heard a rumor that Renee Ross was going to do more hardcore scenes. Can you confirm if there’s any truth to that, Elliot? Also, I really loved the multi-scene, scripted movies (like “K-Jugs” and “Sex in the Titties”) that you guys produced a few years ago. As a fan of Score for almost 20 years, I would love to see more like that!!

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Elliot James

    Jon–That’s news to me. Where did you read that?

    VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jon

    I think I read something on a forum but obviously just wishful thinking since you’d be the man who’d know if she was doing more HC. Oh well, we can dream, right?
    Just curious if you ever reach out to popular former models to invite them to do more modeling or scenes? Diane Poppos comes to mind. I’d LOVE to see some old faves like Charlie Cooper, Seana Rae or Christy Marks. Even a “where are they now” feature would be cool!

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • JR

    On a kinda unrelated note, what’s the name of Maserati’s scene partner in the vid where she wakes him up with grapes & a banana? Have they done other scenes together?

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • James

    I think that there are a certain number of girls who get boob jobs specifically so they can do porn. Also, there is this demand for super skinny girls, so the only way they can have boobs is to be enhanced. On the other hand, girls with natural boobs have had them all their lives, and many don’t even want them. It’s a much bigger step for them to decide to do hard core verses just have their boobs photographed and appreciated.
    Personally, I prefer natural boobs. I would love to see more of Cameron Skye. You can tell that she is truly enjoying herself in her scenes. She has a body that was made for porn, plus it is so rare to see a porn star without any tatoos like her now days. I hope to see more of her soon.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Chris

    People seem to forget that this is a business and the common denominator here is money. I’ve been watching porn a while and in the process have gleaned a bit about how it all works. The thing is augmented actors are usually not so attractive and have a short shelve life, in order to reap optimum returns before eventually burning out they venture into the more sexually explicit acts which I presume earn them more money (Right Elliot?) With the naturally busty girls they have a longer shelve life and can afford to stick to glamour acts without the fear of losing a fan base, In the end they choose to do their first BG scene for a huge payout

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
 

Leave a Comment