A while ago, we received an email from a regular who wanted to see more feet in the pictures, specifically bare feet. His email was gigantic, so I’ll give you the Cliff Notes version: “I go nuts for your gorgeous, big-titted, all-natural models, but I also want to admire their bare feet in all their glory. I am not asking for weird stuff like bondage or peeing. I am not asking for more preggers or hirsute models, who always cause raging debates. I am not even asking to get rid of all the shoes, sneakers, socks, hoses which you (or your readers, or both) seem to adore. I am just asking you to not despise so systematically a beautiful part of every model’s body, which is so readily available: her feet, bare as they come in many real-life situations.”
We actually did a poll on SCORELAND about this issue, and the feet were defeated. Only 23% said they like to see both boobs and feet while 52% said feet are unimportant in big-boob photography. The remaining 25% like a mix of both. Personally, I like to see a model’s feet in the shot but I prefer seeing them wearing heels. (Stripper shoes are the best in my book.) When I’m outside and looking at girls, first I look at their chests, then I look at their feet. But I have to admit, that poll carried a lot of weight with me. The majority are just not into de feet.
Where do you stand on feet?
Categories: The Life of an Editor