Five (and many more) very good reasons the breast of times is now
-
- Karina Hart, 2008
-
- Christy Marks, 2007
-
- Miosotis, 2010
-
- Sharday, 2001
-
- Nicole Peters, 2003
You know, maybe I’m a bit sensitive about this subject because I’ve been the editor of SCORE for all but 17 issues since September 2001, but whenever I hear the 1990s described as the Golden Age of big tits–you know, ultra slim ‘n’ stacked girls like SaRenna Lee, Tiffany Towers and Busty Dusty–I get a bit defensive. There’s no denying that the 1990s really was a golden age of super-enhanced girls with impossibly huge tits sitting on top of impossibly tiny waists. Sure, we’ve had some great girls built in that mold since 2001 (Crystal Gunns, Morgan Leigh, Daphne Rosen, Annina, etc.), but for that kind of girl–the kind that regularly appeared on Jenny Jones and Springer–the 2000s can’t hold a candle to the 1990s.
But you know what? When it comes to naturally stacked girls, the 1990s can’t hold a candle to the 2000s. Not even close. Sure, the ’90s gave us Linsey, Chloe, Lorna, Autumn, Kerry Marie, Diane Poppos, Sammie and a lot of other great girls. But since then, these naturals have come our way: Sharday, Karina Hart, Christy Marks, Merilyn Sakova, Natalie Fiore, Janet Jade, Miosotis, Bea Flora, Nadine Jansen, Nicole Peters, Ashley Sage Ellison, Angela White, Ines Cudna, Brandy Talore, Annie Swanson and so on and so on and so on and so on. And since the start of the new decade, we’ve added Karla James, Arianna Sinn, Taylor Steele and Valory Irene to the mix. I haven’t even mentioned the V-Mag girls.
And I’m going to take this one step further and say that the mix of girls in the magazine and at SCORELAND is better now than it was in the ’90s. People like to say, “The good old days” and “I remember when,” but our minds tend to play tricks on us. We sometimes think that what we had is better than what we have. I’m sometimes surprised to look back and see that some of my favorite porn girls from the ’70s and ’80s, like Sue Nero, Lisa De Leeuw and Kay Parker, weren’t nearly as busty as I remember them being. Compare any current issue of SCORE to any issue from the ’90s–other than a Boob Cruise issue–and you’ll probably come away saying, “These are the best of times.”
That September ’01 SCORE was my first issue as editor, and it just happened to be the “20 Greatest Naturals” celebration. Well, for September 2011, we’re busy planning another “20 Greatest Naturals” issue, and I’m willing to bet that 15 of the 20 will be from 2001 on. Over the next several months, I’ll give you more details about that issue and how we’re going to arrive at the Top 20. There’ll be voting, etc. And if the past 10 years are any indication, over the next several months, a few more candidates for that list will come along.
As usual, when it comes to big tits, there’s a lot to look forward to.
Tags: Angela White, Annie Swanson, Ashley Sage Ellison, Bea Flora, boob comparison, Brandy Talore, Busty Dusty, Chloe Vevrier, comparison, Diane Poppos, greatest naturals issue, Ines Cudna, Karina Hart, Karla James, Kerry Marie, Linsey Dawn McKenzie, Lorna Morgan, Miosotis, natural breasts, natural tits, naturals, Nicole Peters, Sammie, SaRenna Lee, SCORE, Sharday, Tiffany Towers
Categories: Boob Watch, Deep Inside Scoreland
i agree that the 2000s are way better boob wise!but the best natural breasted girl of the 2000s is not covered at scoreland!!! “HITOMI TANAKA”!!!why not???
Sorry Dave, but I totally disagree. Although Miosotis is my favorite of the bunch (and I think Christy Marks is totally overrated), I don’t think any single one of these girls holds a candle to the slim and stacked girls of the 90’s. It has nothing to do with nostalgia. Score is about HUGE BOOBS, real or enhanced. Enhanced ones are just as good in my opinion. Not one of these girls comes close to Busty Dusty, Tracy Topps, Sarenna Lee, Lisa Chest, Wendy Whoppers, Tiffany Towers, Casey James, Deena Duos, Lisa Lipps, or even natural girls from that period, like Europe Dichan, or Chloe Vervier. Girls who are still around who do match the 90’s legends are rarely in your magazine or on your website anymore, like Maxi Mounds, Chelsea Charms, and Keisha Evans.
That’s my opinion.
Hey Dave,
Interesting topic ..
I have been with Score since the “Golden Age” of super enhanced models and you are right, there was incredible huge tits sitting on very petite women. These days will never be repeated and our memories are somewhat selective.
However, I agree that we have seen some amazing natural busted models since 2000 with the five ladies you have shown and dozens more.
The great thing is that Scoreland enables us to view both the fantastic current group of models while visiting the past for our long time favourites.
Score Group readers really do live in the “breast of times” 🙂
I’ll agree. The 90’s was a special time but I wouldn’t trade what we have today for yesteryear. Give me above average naturals over gigantic fakies ANY DAY!!!
I could go my entire life without ever seeing another enhanced breast. Naturals are what I want to see.
The 2000s was definetly better than the 1990s. (boob-wise that is)
About the 20 greatest naurals celebration: There’s no contest for the number 1 spot!
KERRY MARIE!!!