Scientists make a great boob discovery!

July 7, 2012 by Maria

Scientists who study tits are pretty fucking awesome scientists, right? Who wouldn't want to study jugs like Merilyn's?

According to a new study published online on June 30 in the journal BMC Medical Genetics, researchers have identified seven genetic markers linked with a woman’s breast size.

The study was led by researcher Nicholas Eriksson.

In the study, Eriksson and colleagues analyzed information from 16,175 female customers of European ancestry and compared their answers to survey questions, including bra cup size and bra band size, to their genetic information.

And based on that research, they now have the genetic markers needed to know what size tits a woman will have.

That’s the kind of science we like.

Being able to know what women will be chest-blessed early on? Sure, why not?

Breast men everywhere could have a heads up on who the next “great one” could be.

I can respect that kind of science. Can’t you?

Now if only scientist could give all women big tits…that’ll be the day!

xoxo

Maria

Tags: , , , , , ,

Categories:

5 responses to “Scientists make a great boob discovery!”

  1. othersideofnight says:

    I don’t think big is necessarily better than small in essence. Neither one is ultimately better than the other. I think it’s relative, in the big picture. It’s another one of those widely held cross social-cultural ideas about beauty and sexuality. The advancing of science is amazing but it’s how we interpret some of these things as people, in that respect it says something about ourselves. Without examination, on the one side it looks good. It looks like just a harmless physical preference. A closer look shows that it has an unfortunate flip side. What about how people perceive women who don’t have these popular ideal physical attributes? Are we saying the are not blessed, therefore worthy of appreciation or attention? Are we saying they are not beautiful and sexually attractive? How do we treat them? I think it’s parochial to focus only on size. Although size is nice too, it’s not how big the picture is painted, it’s the lines, the details, the unique perfections and imperfections that make it distinctly appealing. It’s more than the sum of it’s parts, which was made into a whole out of millions of possibilities.

  2. Michael says:

    Is it even possible, through the less thick top area of Merilyn’s breast, to hear her heartbeat? They are wonderful!

  3. X.D. says:

    I LOVE BOOBOLOGY!!!!

  4. Anonymous says:

    Hello Maria,
    I think boob sience is underdeveloped. I want further research in the double/50% boob waist ratio. That is boobs should be double the size of the waist, or other way around, waist should max be 50% of the boob size. For example LDM is 56-23 which is a very good ratio. The sience could help boob gifted girls to optimize their waist in order to ensure maximum curviness. It can also help young girls register themself into Scoreland and they can track how the ratio improves as they matures and work on the ratio. You can also have some sort of incentive system which kicks in from when they reach double/50% benchmark. I think definitely more research is welcome in this part. Personally I think this will help humanity much more than further studying the Higgins particle. One day perhaps boob since would qualify for Noble price? What do you think?

  5. Anonymous says:

    Hi Maria, great with more sience and I also want the “two/50% factor” to be further focus in the research. This is that the woman’s waist should ideally be 50% in size of the boobs size, or other way, that the boobs should be 2 times the size of a given waist size. The the research can start systematically measure the ratio and give adice to girls how to maximize the ratio. I think some gifted big busted girls today are fumbeling how to reduce the waist. Perhaps reserach will also show girls how to enlarge the tit size given their waist size. I think the maximation the ratio should be a special descipline in the research. Then there should be some registers that girls can register themselves, on free will of course, from say the age of 16. That register can then be linked to Scoreland, so the recruitment of scoremodels can be more sientific and you can use direct promotions etc. What do you think?