The outer limits of breast fetishes

January 20, 2010 by Elliot James

We received a letter that will be in this week’s “Scorecard” about a topic that’s rarely discussed in boob magazines or on the Net because its focus is so extremely narrow: breast vascularity.

The magnificent mounds of Nicole Peters.

The magnificent mounds of Nicole Peters.

C.H. wrote us about a girl he saw in a grocery store: “She was dressed rather conservatively except that the neckline of her blouse was cut about as low as it could be, legally speaking, to showcase a rack that was huge, quivering and even vascular to some extent. I mean with a blue vein or two showing on the creamy nakedness. Right on the verge of being gross, you know what I mean? This vascularity thing interests me as I have not really seen it too often on tits. I think I would notice it if it were there. Minka has it, for instance, although not real prominently. But with Minka, I figure it is only logical that such massive implants would increase the blood supply of the supporting structures. The grocery store lady, on the other hand, had tits so perfect, both as to size and quiver, that I figured they had to be naturals. My fantasy is that she got them that way and maintains them that way by simply milking them a lot or by having it done. Seems like that would be a better way to go than implants, and with the added advantage that the hormone changes, etc., might make for a lushified pussy, too.”

Lorna was not pregnant on SCORE's Eleuthera trip.

Lorna was not pregnant on SCORE's Eleuthera trip.

C.H. is really into the veiny look, at least on a fantasy level. I’ve never met a woman who deliberately cultivated the look. (Sounds like a story the writers of the TV show Nip/Tuck might use.) Breast vascularity is really an obscure subject even among the most intense boob aficionados. Most of us tit lovers focus first on size, then shape, the way they hang and how the nipples and areolae look. When you Google “breast vascularity,” it pulls up a lot of medical papers and complicated scientific journals. As yet, I haven’t found anything about it on any forums that focus on their erotic appeal other than the fact that there are some guys who like the look.

Lactation can lead to increased surface vascularity, so our friend C.H. is basically on the right track. We know that veins can become more pronounced during pregnancy and that blue veins are most visible underneath thin, pale-white skin. Some women who have it don’t like it, are embarrassed by it and use Vitamin K creams to try and fade their appearance. Personally, I don’t mind vascularity as long as it’s not extreme with bulging surface veins. What do you think about the veiny look?

One of my favorite pairs, owned by Romina Lopez.

One of my favorite pairs, owned by Romina Lopez.

Tags: , , , ,

Categories:

6 responses to “The outer limits of breast fetishes”

  1. Jammer says:

    Damn, I though I was the only pervert who found breast veins attractive. Glad to know that I am not alone. A few years ago I dated a woman with gorgeous 34DD breasts. She was 44 with two grown kids, and the veins showing through her pale skin used to drive me wild. She was very self-conscious about them at first, but I eventually convinced her that they were beautiful. Now I’m on the lookout for another woman who is similarly blessed.

  2. MontyP says:

    I don’t mind either way, really.

  3. Matador says:

    I freakin’ LOVE the veiny look, when the veins rise along the breast, kind of like say, oh, the Alaska Pipeline. Seriously, it makes the breast look all engorged. I think it’s super sexy.

  4. jdawg says:

    samantha 38g was featured in v-mag a couple of months ago and she really had some viens popping on them titties.
    thought i was looking at a road map.

  5. Craig says:

    The most prominant of the biggest bust stars with very prominant veins was Busty Dusty

  6. coriaceo says:

    hello fantastica!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!