There’s a party going on at SCORELAND. So far, there haven’t been any party poopers
Leanne Crow measures up among the Top 20 SCORE Girls ever.
Among the things I’ve enjoyed most so far in the “20 for 20” celebration at SCORELAND are the comments members have been posting regarding the day-by-day unveiling of the Top 20 SCORE Girls of all-time. The comments have been interesting and at the same time civil (in most cases). It’s nice when you guys find a way to compliment a model without criticizing another model (or find a way to say something not-so-positive about a girl without sounding quite-so-negative). The good stuff started on the first day with the unveiling of SaRenna Lee at No. 20. Wrote Jorga, “Really people?? SaRenna should’ve at least made the top 5.” Added SB, “I agree- top three- could even peg her as #1.” But I also liked crajosto’s comment: “This is very sad – she is worthy of the top 3 – most recent popular girls in SCORE should really be Voluptuous models – there should be a cut off at 27 inch waist.”
Okay, that’s a biting criticism. But notice how crajosto didn’t name names. He stated his opinion in a very diplomatic manner.
Some people were surprised that Venera finished 19th. Some people might be surprised that there could actually be 18 girls better than her.
When Venera landed at No. 19, babyblue eyes said what a lot of us were thinking: “Why should it be such a surprise that a newcomer would rate this high? Combine this with yesterday’s gnashing of teeth that SaRenna Lee was only No. 20, and what you can surmise is that there isn’t a lot of historical context among SCORELAND members. Those of us who have been around long enough to have bought SCORE and Voluptuous when they were first issued on the newsstand have an appreciation for the ‘legends’ of the industry, but the number of online votes placed by those early readers are no doubt overwhelmed by those who grew up in the Internet era and might not have sufficient recollection of the likes of Chloe Vevrier or Danni Ashe. But that’s true in any all-time rankings done by popular vote: what’s been published most recently is most recent in the reader’s thoughts.”
My thoughts exactly. But then again…if it’s really true that SCORELAND members lack historical perspective…well, I don’t want to give away the rest of the results, but I will tell you that there’s a lot of historical perspective in the top four, which will be revealed next week. So I’m not sure history has anything to do with it. Of course, that’s a subject for debate.
Members have been reminiscing, which is one of the things a celebration like this is all about. They’ve been telling us who they had in their top five. They’ve been talking about girls who didn’t make the list (so far, that is). They’ve been taking about their love affair with big boobs. There has been a lot of spirited back and forth.
Hitomi is great, but is she too new to be considered among the greatest ever?
Another example of respectful criticism came when Hitomi was unveiled at No. 10. Carney22 wrote, “Not to take anything away from Hitomi; she’s quite lovely, and her breasts are stupendous. But this is just another model whose career began far too recently to be rated this high. This is supposed to be a 20th anniversary series, not a best-of-the-last three years feature. But that’s what you get when you let the readers do the rankings online.”
Okay. Fair enough. But, like I said, get ready for the top four. And remember: SaRenna, Danni, Lorna and Kerry didn’t exactly make their debuts yesterday. They all debuted in the 1990s.
Of course, sometimes, people can’t help but show their fangs, which happened yesterday when Leanne Crow came in at No. 8. Wrote Chuck, “In my humble opinion, to have a model who has never shown pink and never done a b/g scene and is put number 9 in the all time models of SCORE for the last 20 years says one thing…RIGGED! And don’t go talkin about how beautiful she is cause several models placed after her are better looking and definitely show a whole lot more. I’d be willing to bet a Yankee dollar that Ashley Sage Ellison will wind up in the top 5. Gotta take care of them English models, right?”
Well, Chuck, as for Ashley Sage Ellison, you owe us a Yankee dollar. Ashley wasn’t on the “20 for 20” ballot.
As for your accusation that the whole thing was rigged…well, Chuck, if it was rigged, SaRenna Lee would’ve been in the top three.
Anyway, gentlemen and ladies, keep commenting like gentlemen and ladies. This party has been a blast, and we still have eight days to go!
Tags: 20 for 20, 20th anniversary, 20th anniversary SCORE, Angela White, big boobs, Contest, Danni Ashe, Hitomi, June '12 SCORE, Kerry Marie, Leanne Crow, Lorna Morgan, naturals, poll. great girls, SaRenna Lee, SCORE, SCORELAND, SCOREs 20th Anniversary, tits, Venera, voting
Categories: Boob Watch, Letters and Comments, New at Scoreland, Poll
CA, it means since the first edition. There’s several I know who keep in touch.
Actually, after a number of new models being ranked in the ‘teens, I’ve been happy to see some outstanding models with a little bit thicker resumes show up in the last few days.
And I’m very encouraged by Dave’s tease about the Final 4. What’s interesting is that one could come up with a number of legendary models from the earlier days, and it sounds like four of them made it and the rest didn’t make the list at all 🙂
Here’s an interesting thought: I just took a look at the June 2002 edition of SCORE here on the site. Not surprisingly, they had a 10th Anniversary feature, and they picked a representative list of 10 models (not necessarily the 10 best; each model was tied in to one of the 10 years of publication). And of that 10? The only one that’s shown up yet is SaRenna Lee. Of the others, I would imagine that Linsey Dawn McKenzie will make an appearance in the top 20 in the next few days, perhaps even Dawn Stone or Tiffany Towers. But it is kind of interesting . . . have the older legends been forgotten? Or has the fact that SCORE became so established had the effect of bringing bigger and better models into the business in the years since?
Of course, there’s no way to answer that . . . we know what we like, and we vote accordingly 🙂
@Elliot,, charter score reader???? does this mean long time reader????
the vote was always going to be varied but yes a lot of newer members and readers are going to vote for what they know,, if a member has been viewing in the last couple of years hes going to stick with what he knows Hitomi, Venera etc and is not likely to vote Chloe Vevrier or Lorna Morgan…. thats just how it works…. as for Chuck what can i say,, Rigged??? dont be ridiculous,, score prides itself on readers and members contributions so to suggest that is just absurd and as for the whole not showing pink thing dont get me started…. hey Chuck its all about the tits!!!!!! what part of that dont you get….
I know crajosto a long time. Charter SCORE reader/DVD viewer/website member and a gentleman. He visited the building a few years ago.