I’d compare Venera to Merilyn Sakova, but in all honesty, I’d rather get kicked in the balls
Merilyn Sakova. Superstar. One of the greatest naturals ever.
Venera. Superstar? Hey, I'm not saying anything. It'll get me in trouble.
For starters and for the record, I’d just like to say that I’m not labeling anyone as “the next” or an all-time great or an instant superstar. We did that about a year and a half ago with Karla James, and SCORELAND members and SCORE readers immediately lashed out. Their problem should have been with me, comparing a newcomer to perhaps the greatest natural ever, but many of them took it out on Karla, which was definitely unfair. Of course, those same members and readers [SPOILER ALERT!] promptly voted her one of SCORE‘s 20 Greatest Naturals in the September 2011 issue (on-sale today at eBoobStore.com), so go figure.
Anyway, for the record, I am not saying that Venera (who debuted on the Blog last week and debuts at SCORELAND tomorrow on the first day of a three-day “Meet Venera” special) is the next Merilyn Sakova or is as good as Merilyn or as pretty as Merilyn or has as good a body at Merilyn. I have my opinions on these matters, but I’m going to keep them to myself.
All I’m saying is that when it comes to slim ‘n’ stacked naturals, Venera and Merilyn are very similar in that they both have the cock-hardening combination of huge tits with a tiny waist and–this is a matter of fact–that combination to such an extreme proportion has been seen very few times in the history of tits and waists.
And that’s all I’m saying.