January 10, 2012 by Dave
Daphne Rosen gets ready to do research into Maggie Green's ability to achieve orgasm. See the DVD "Boob Science" for test results.
Usually, I don’t go to The Huffington Post for news, but this was one story I couldn’t ignore. The headline: “Climax In An MRI Machine? Been There, Done That.”
I haven’t (although I admit to having had a hard-on in an MRI machine once). Apparently, the author of this story, Kayt Sukel, fingered herself to an orgasm in an MRI machine–while scientists watched–for scientific research. Wrote Ms. Sukel prior to the experiment, “No, I am not sure I’ll actually be able to do it. But, as instructed, I have been practicing at home and will give it my best shot.”
Well, she did manage to do it, and since you can’t have metal objects in an MRI, she couldn’t use a vibrator or anything else with metal or batteries. She got herself off with her own fingers. Actually, I’m wondering why they didn’t use men for this study since we don’t need toys to get off (although I kinda doubt they would have let me into the MRI with a copy of SCORE).
Okay, I just realized why they didn’t use men: Pussy juice is a lot easier to clean up than white, sticky, male cum. Glazing the inside of an MRI machine…that wouldn’t be pretty.
Another reason: They were measuring brain waves during female orgasm.
We already know how the male brain functions during orgasm.
It doesn’t.
So, once again, I ask the question: Could you jack in a MRI machine with people watching?
November 17, 2011 by Elliot James
Can 2010 SCORE Model of the Year Eva Notty cum from nipple play?
The belief that women can reach orgasm by breast stimulation alone is proposed by sexologists Marshall Miller and Dorian Solot, authors of I Love Female Orgasm: An Extraordinary Orgasm Guide. Their studies indicate that 1% of women report the ability to achieve the Big O through manual stimulation of their breasts. That’s a tiny percentage. I’ve read elsewhere that it’s 2%, not much of an increase.
Female Blog readers, feel free to chime in on this. Have you had an orgasm through breast and nipple arousal alone, either by fingers, a vibrator or a breast pump?
A study published in the Annals of Plastic Surgery that examined the breasts of approximately 600 women provided statistical evidence that the left breast is bigger than the right, proving that it’s totally normal for a woman’s boobs to be unequal in size. It‘s an old wives tale that if a woman‘s left breast is bigger than the right during pregnancy, she’s having a girl, and if the right is bigger, the baby will be a boy. Thanks to the Internet, those old wives have made a big contribution to misinformation.
Shyla's right boob is bigger than her left.
Mating was so much easier generations ago. That's Rachel Love from Mamazon.
Evolutionary psychologists, and a lot of other brainy dudes, have always theorized why we prefer women with large boobs. (Dave wrote about zoologist Desmond Morris comparing tits to asscheeks in an October 22 Blog.) Historically, large boobs are a sign of fertility. Check out any ancient statue of a fertility goddess, although none of them even come close to Leanne Crow or Jenna Valentine in sheer stacktitude. Harvard anthropologist Frank Marlowe’s study, The Nubility Hypothesis, theorizes that females evolved protruding breasts because the size and shape of breasts function as a signal of reproductive value to a man. Women with greater reproductive value are preferred by males. Upturned and pointed breasts became “sexual releasers of approach behavior for heterosexual males.” In plain Boobish, a language we are fluent in, chicks with big tits are hotter and attract more potential baby-daddies. That’s the theory, anyway. On the other side of the coin, many guys are not tit-men. Many guys are ass men, others leg men. All I can add is more study is needed. If I can get a grant from Yale, and don’t blow it at my local lap dance club in less than a week, I’ll continue the research.
