Tag Archive: Tiffany Towers
February 1, 2011 by Dave
Listen, I know I shouldn’t be going to AOL.com for news, but sometimes I do, and this tagline caught my eye: “Plunging Necklines Dominate SAG Awards,” SAG being the Screen Actors Guild. “Great,” I thought. “Big celebrity tits,” and right off, I should have thought, “Stupid me,” because what celebrity has big tits? I mean really big tits, other than Christina Hendricks from Mad Men, and even she isn’t SCORE big (although she’s welcome to find out).
So I took the leap. I clicked on the link, and that led me to,
Plunging Necklines Dominate the 2011 SAG Awards Red Carpet
once again, and this opening paragraph: “Plunging necklines and daring cleavage dominated the red carpet at the 2011 Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Awards with Sofia Vergara, Christina Hendricks and Eva Longoris leading the pack.” At which point my eye wandered to six photos of six celebrities, all of whom supposedly were wearing dresses with “plunging necklines” that exposed “daring cleavage.”
Bullshit. All I saw were five not-so-stacked celebrities with plunging necklines that didn’t reveal much and one semi-stacked chick (Christina) who was wearing the least-daring dress of all.
Meanwhile at USMagazine.com,
Cleavage Wars at the SAGs!
Of course, more disappointment. The website asked, “Who won this year’s cleavage awards?” and thank goodness some woman named Susan Zemitas Richmond was smart enough to comment, “The only one with any cleavage is Sofia Vergara. The others are just showing skin.”
Exactly. If you’re a boob man, you had about as much chance at jacking successfully to the SAG Awards as any of these women have of getting into SCORE.
NOTE TO THE REST OF THE WORLD: JUST BECAUSE A WOMAN IS WEARING A LOW-CUT DRESS OR TOP DOESN’T MEAN SHE’S SHOWING CLEAVAGE. IF YOU DON’T HAVE CLEAVAGE, YOU DON’T HAVE ANY TO SHOW! THERE’S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SKIN AND CLEAVAGE.
So, just to set the record straight. Cleavage:
Renee Ross
SaRenna Lee
Tiffany Towers
If any of these girls came walking down the red carpet at any awards show, the international media would have a collective heart attack and realize what actual cleavage is all about. And they’d realize that this has nothing to do with cleavage: 
October 8, 2010 by Dave
Tawny Peaks is one of the greatest SCORE Girls ever…depending upon who you ask.
When you pick up a copy of SCORE (or browse the on-line version at SCORELAND), do you expect to like every single pictorial? And if you don’t like every single pictorial, will you swear to never buy another issue or subscribe for another month?
I’m praying that your answer to both questions is “No.” Because if it’s not, I’m in trouble.
Back when I was a magazine buyer (as opposed to the editor of SCORE), I was willing to fork over my money for a mag if there was just one pictorial that I knew would get me off over and over again. Back then, I figured five or six dollars was a small price to pay for a half-dozen or more quality jacks. And if an issue had three or four pictorials that got me off, it was a keeper. An all-time great.
Because let’s face it: Even though we’re all big-boob lovers here, we all have different tastes in boobs, girls, bodies, etc. And the odds of every single reader/member being satisfied with every single pictorial in a particular issue are…well, I probably have a better shot at hitting the lottery. The big one.
I started buying SCORE and Voluptuous sight unseen because I could depend on every single issue having at least two, three or more girls who wouldn’t get me down. And that was enough. I mean, even back then, I knew that SCORE wasn’t my own, personal magazine. It wasn’t published just for me, a focus group of one.
And now that I’m the editor of SCORE, I can’t put a girl in the mag just because I like her. I have to be pretty certain that a lot of readers will like her, too. Not every reader. A lot of them. But I know that satisfying everybody with every pictorial will be impossible.
Ashley Sage Ellison always seems to be at the center of controversy. I'd rather stare at her tits than argue.
One day, I got this letter from B.P. of Toronto, Ontario: “I was a little disappointed in the girls you selected for the bikini pictorial in the August issue. They were all in the huge, super-breasted category. To me, what makes a great bikini girl is not just the way her tits look but also her legs, waist and overall physique. I agree with your choice of Tiffany Towers, but Tawny Peaks? C’mon! She has big tits, but there are SCORE Girls with smaller tits who look better in a bikini.”
But then, the next day, I got this via email: “Re: bikini contest. Although they are all extremely hot I have to vote for Tawny Peaks. She defines a sexy woman.”
So, one guy doesn’t think Tawny Peaks shouldn’t be anywhere near a bikini contest, and the next guy thinks she’s the definition of a SCORE bikini girl.
One guy thinks Ashley Sage Ellison is perfect. The next guy threatens to cancel his subscription if we ever run another photo of Ashley.
And then, when we run another photo of Ashley, and the second guy accuses us of not listening to the readers.
Some readers want us to reject any model who won’t fuck, no matter how stacked she is. Other readers don’t want to see any cock in the magazine. How can you please both? You can’t. It’s impossible.
I could stop running pictures of Minka in SCORE. But then I'd have to go looking for a new job.
Here’s an excerpt from a letter I ran in the January 2011 issue of SCORE. It’s from Ed of Iowa: “I love naturals: naturally busty and naturally beautiful (as opposed to skinny girls smuggling basketballs). There is definitely nothing wrong with beauties such as Ashley Sage Ellison, Karina Hart or Christy Marks in either magazine. It’s when you feature models like Minka, Lexxi Tyler or Danielle Derek that I have no interest in. Wasted pages that could have decent photo layouts.”
Do you see that? He’s criticizing Minka, one of the most-requested models of all-time! If I go three issues without putting Minka in SCORE, I’m sure to get the “Where’s Minka?” letters and emails.
But then there was this recent Blog comment from J.P. regarding my posting, “Five (and many more) very good reasons the breast of times is now.” “Sorry, Dave, but I totally disagree. Although Miosotis is my favorite of the bunch (and I think Christy Marks is totally overrated), I don’t think any single one of these girls holds a candle to the slim and stacked girls of the 90s. It has nothing to do with nostalgia. SCORE is about HUGE BOOBS, real or enhanced. Enhanced ones are just as good in my opinion.”
Anyway, the purpose of this posting is to 1.) Let you know how we go about doing things and 2.) Let you know that we are listening. We’re always listening. But listening and doing exactly what every reader says are two completely different things. The former is something we do every day. The latter is impossible. Fortunately, keeping every reader and member satisfied isn’t impossible. It’s a matter of getting the recipe right. Using the proper ingredients. And that’s both the challenge and the fun part.
So you keep letting us know what you want. And we’ll keep on sorting this whole thing out…even if, sometimes, it’s enough to drive an editor crazy!
October 2, 2010 by Dave
-
-
Karina Hart, 2008
-
-
Christy Marks, 2007
-
-
Miosotis, 2010
-
-
Sharday, 2001
-
-
Nicole Peters, 2003
You know, maybe I’m a bit sensitive about this subject because I’ve been the editor of SCORE for all but 17 issues since September 2001, but whenever I hear the 1990s described as the Golden Age of big tits–you know, ultra slim ‘n’ stacked girls like SaRenna Lee, Tiffany Towers and Busty Dusty–I get a bit defensive. There’s no denying that the 1990s really was a golden age of super-enhanced girls with impossibly huge tits sitting on top of impossibly tiny waists. Sure, we’ve had some great girls built in that mold since 2001 (Crystal Gunns, Morgan Leigh, Daphne Rosen, Annina, etc.), but for that kind of girl–the kind that regularly appeared on Jenny Jones and Springer–the 2000s can’t hold a candle to the 1990s.
But you know what? When it comes to naturally stacked girls, the 1990s can’t hold a candle to the 2000s. Not even close. Sure, the ’90s gave us Linsey, Chloe, Lorna, Autumn, Kerry Marie, Diane Poppos, Sammie and a lot of other great girls. But since then, these naturals have come our way: Sharday, Karina Hart, Christy Marks, Merilyn Sakova, Natalie Fiore, Janet Jade, Miosotis, Bea Flora, Nadine Jansen, Nicole Peters, Ashley Sage Ellison, Angela White, Ines Cudna, Brandy Talore, Annie Swanson and so on and so on and so on and so on. And since the start of the new decade, we’ve added Karla James, Arianna Sinn, Taylor Steele and Valory Irene to the mix. I haven’t even mentioned the V-Mag girls.
And I’m going to take this one step further and say that the mix of girls in the magazine and at SCORELAND is better now than it was in the ’90s. People like to say, “The good old days” and “I remember when,” but our minds tend to play tricks on us. We sometimes think that what we had is better than what we have. I’m sometimes surprised to look back and see that some of my favorite porn girls from the ’70s and ’80s, like Sue Nero, Lisa De Leeuw and Kay Parker, weren’t nearly as busty as I remember them being. Compare any current issue of SCORE to any issue from the ’90s–other than a Boob Cruise issue–and you’ll probably come away saying, “These are the best of times.”
That September ’01 SCORE was my first issue as editor, and it just happened to be the “20 Greatest Naturals” celebration. Well, for September 2011, we’re busy planning another “20 Greatest Naturals” issue, and I’m willing to bet that 15 of the 20 will be from 2001 on. Over the next several months, I’ll give you more details about that issue and how we’re going to arrive at the Top 20. There’ll be voting, etc. And if the past 10 years are any indication, over the next several months, a few more candidates for that list will come along.
As usual, when it comes to big tits, there’s a lot to look forward to.
May 23, 2010 by Elliot James
Angelique spilled out at newsstands and mag shops this month in 1995.
What did SCORE readers buy 15 years ago this month? The July 1995 SCORE featured Angelique as the sole covergirl. The U.S. cover price was $5.95, $6.95 in Canada. It wasn’t sealed in a plastic bag with a free DVD inside like it is today. Back then, the art director and editor created back covers that looked like a front cover. For this issue, the back cover girl was Jay Sweet from Belfast, Northern Ireland. (Jay later changed her name to Angelica Foxxx and then Sam Bond. She’s still modeling in England.)
Irish bombshell Jay Sweet brought up the rear.
Why a back cover that was designed like the front? Because studies showed that at busy newsstands, many browsers would pick up a magazine, look through it, then put it back on the rack backwards. So with this technique, the SCORE title was always visible. Annoyed store clerks liked it, too.
The pictorials featured Tiffany Towers and Tawny Peaks in a girl-girl, Bonnie Banks, Angelique and Jay plus a Lilli Xene layout and interview. I’ve heard that Lilli Xene (pronounced “Zen-A”) became a housedancer in a California club, but I don’t know if she’s still dancing. “Nice Ass” was a six-page photo article of bootyfull SCORE Girl butts. Dipping into the Internet explosion, “Fantastic Fantasies” by Ricky Java kicked off. One of the first Netizens of the Boob Brotherhood and a Boob Cruise passenger, Rick morphed photographs to give SCORE models impossible dimensions. For this first installment, he performed massive cyber-boob jobs on Minka, Angelique, Traci Topps and Lisa Chest. Rick just emailed the other day to touch base, and he is as breastnotized as ever.
Fantastic Fantasies kicked off on page 34 of July 1995 SCORE.
What else did you get in July ’95? A lotta stuff. A chesty short story called “Old Tricks” by Bo Alexander with sensational art by the Baron of Bazongas, Otis Sweat. “Fantasy SCORE” by Duncan Gutteridge. “Bomber Girls” by Otis. “Homebodies,” the amateur section with pictures girls sent in with the hopes of being called to model. My column, “Boob Beat,” with pix of Angelique, Chessie Moore, Lilli Xene and Letha Weapons causing trouble at the Consumer Electronics Show. An army of photographers was all over Angelique at the convention, and she played it up for them. She didn’t need to speak English, just squeeze her tits. And in “Scorecard,” our readers’ forum, the guys wrote letters about Busty Dusty, Tiffany Towers, Tawny Peaks, Honey Hills and Winona Lind. Real letters made out of paper, too. Stamped and delivered in a bag by a human. Few people had email in 1995.
Today, a copy of the July 1995 SCORE in good condition lists at $20.95 by back-issue magazine dealers.
And that’s how it was 15 years ago.
