Matrix pix nix leaves Morgan out in the sticks at number ninety-six
I’d prepared this video for the blog last week for future posting. Since Morgan was voted #96 yesterday in the “Best of the Decade” at SCORELAND, I’m going to run it today. I’ve kept away from commenting about the contest–and I probably won’t again after this–but I have to say that I’m shocked, and I don’t shock easily. I’m not saying this because I was on the Boob Cruise with Morgan in 2000 (before she started modeling) or because I connected her with our studio in June 2006, when she achieved her ultimate look in sweater destruction. I’m just powerfully surprised because here’s someone who won SCORE Newcomer of the Year in 2006 (beating out Brianna Costello, Rukhsana, Sydney Simona, Gianna, Daphne Rosen, and Anna Song), does solo videos in which she is hornier and hotter than many girls are in hardcore videos with guys (and in those videos does perfect JO encouragement in her sexy British accent), has so far appeared in 13 pictorials and close to two dozen videos including a Tits & Tugs and has generated a ton of fan mail the past three years. If that’s not popularity, I don’t know what is.
Anyway, this video also shows what a dream Morgan is for our photographers to shoot. They love it when she’s in the studio because she makes it fun for them, too. She’s not into it for the money. Morgan loves to pose, and that shows on film.
Tags: Best of the decade, Morgan Leigh
Categories: Deep Inside Scoreland
leigh definitely deserves to be in the top 10. one of the best girls on the talent roster. even if she only ever does soft, it’s worth it. infact, part of me is glad she is solo only. it’s seldom we see this in adult entertainment these days. in many ways it’s alot more sexier.
In what DVD is that video? Morgan Leigh; thanks
Morgan Leigh is one of the hottest, no doubt.
It is such a shame that Score doesn’t feature her more often and it is an even bigger shame that some of her Score clips are not made very well.
But thats no big surprise for me; Score has gone the wrong way (featureing too much shabby fat chicks or quite average chix and far too few real hotties), and i guess their turnover will prove me right
I have no idea what’s the percentage is??? All i know is crystal is voted 91 really guys.. Her video’s are super hot and her pictorials are incredibly sexy.. I’m stunned even more stunned then the mets winning three in a row. It makes no sense dave. People are not looking at the model’s layout’s or something. Crystal was my 1# it’s a head scratcher. I’m still mad at this bullshit… 🙁
Tom said, “I sure am glad I found this blog, because I was beginning to think that Score Magazine was “fixing” the voting.”
Believe me, if we could fix the voting, we certainly wouldn’t have fixed it this way! Some great SCORE Girls are getting voted out early, and we certainly wouldn’t have asked for that.
Amazingly, Crystal Gunns got voted out by a wide margin; wasn’t even close. Truly a shocker because not only was she one of the most popular SCORE Girls of the decade, she was also one of the most influential (and a girl who was an ambassador for the magazine). A Newcomer of the Year and a Model of the Year.
I’m afraid that people aren’t taking into account the models’ entire body of work over the decade. It is becoming a “what have you done for me lately?” contest. A good example of this is Auralgasm’s comment, “Perhaps they should have shortened it to top 50 because there are many models on the list who haven’t worked in ages (i.e. Sarah Mercury)” Well, in the early part of this decade, few V-Mag models were as popular as Sarah. We used to say that if we wanted an issue to be a big seller, just put Sarah on the cover.
SCORE chief John Fox has been following the voting, and the other day he said to me, “Dave, we gave these guys the power.” Certainly, we could have done a Top 100 without member input (and that Top 100 would have had Crystal Gunns in the top five of the decade, guaranteed). But we decided to do it this way, so let’s just have fun with it and keep debating along the way.
By the way, can anyone guess what percentage of each day’s vote it usually takes for a model to get eliminated?
I sure am glad I found this blog, because I was beginning to think that Score Magazine was “fixing” the voting. I do agree with other readers about preferring the voluptuous, all natural models, but I can’t see Daphne Rosen, Crystal Gunns, and Alena Snow in the bottom 10. Alena’s librarian pictorial is one of my all time favorites. This is clearly a strike against enhancements and unfortunately not the models themselves.
I too am mystified how certain girls were voted to the cellar part of this list. Crystal Gunns #91?!?!? Morgan Leigh #96?!?!?!? These are possible the hottest pieces of tail to grace Scoreland! Sure they’re augmented and I’m a fan of naturals but these girls are still some incredible eye candy! There are models more deserving of being at the bottom. Take Angel Gee for example — One, I’ve never heard of her, Two, she’s augmented and three, she’s not very blessed in the looks department…but to each his own. Also where are the Voluptuous women in this countdown?
Long story short I believe the voting is kinda backwards as well. Perhaps they should have shortened it to top 50 because there are many models on the list who haven’t worked in ages (i.e. Sarah Mercury).
O.K. so I wasn’t going to post anything about how the voting system is flawed until I logged on today and saw that Crystal Gunns was voted 91st. WTF!!! Who’s voting? Is it just V-mag men/women who dislike the classic stacked score girl or is that scorelanders can’t read directions? At this rate I hope there will be someone I can vote for in the top ten. Something tells me that if Sarenna Lee and Lisa Lipps were in this poll they would also end up in the bottom ten. Enhanced blondes are just not getting votes.
To me it seems as if it is cheating in the vote.
That’s all not real!
Now Harmony Bliss?! I really think that the voters don’t understand the concept of this contest. I think they have managed to vote out at least half of my top ten already. They must be voting for their favorites every time; that’s the only thing that makes sense.
VOTERS: Dave has the right idea. Think of it like Survivor. YOU ARE VOTING FOR YOUR LEAST FAVORITE EACH TIME.
Just wondering why isnt LDM in this list?
J.A.M this isn’t rocket science…lol. I for one was with score form the beginning. the 90’s was the slim and stack and as time went on. it seems that the 2000’s is the decade of the big and natural tits. It’s score’s fault…lol.. They are finding great big natural tited model’s….Thank you score 🙂
I agree that this ranking is bad–I don’t know how to vote for my favorite girls backwards! Picking your least favorite girls in order??? I gave up on this right away. It’s confusing and it won’t work accurately–it should be cancelled.
I’m also shocked, SHOCKED that Keisha Evans was #100! And Aletha Snow right after her?
I remember when SCORE was a BIG BOOB magazine. Do your other readers?
As a girl that loves natural tits…I think that things are going fine.
And I doubt that super-titters like Crystal Gunns or Rukhsana are going anywhere anytime soon and that’s cool with me. I like those ladies a whole bunch. I don’t see what all the stink is about…
and at the end of the day I think that the SCORELANDERS are going to elevate the right lady into the number one spot. I trust their judgment and choices.
🙂
I prefer the natural ‘home grown’ boobs, but come on! Cindy Cupps?
She’s prettier than alot of the girls in the ‘new wave of (european) natural boobies’.
Cindy Cupps, one of the top SCORE models of the decade (she debuted in the January 2000 issue) goes out at No. 94. This one wasn’t even close with Cindy getting more than double the votes of any other model. The voting was close until the evening (which has been the case all along). Voters continue to eliminate the non-naturals in the “Best of the Decade” voting. Who’s next?
Meanwhile, examining the voting, I’m detecting another trend developing after the enhanced attack. I’m not going to tell you what it is, but I will say this: all of the top 12 vote-getters yesterday fall into one of two categories.
I think scoreland members taste are changing. I know i have, ten years ago i was all about slim and stack a score man, but as i got older my taste change to all natural and curves.I still have old faves like crystal gunns, saReena lee and daylene rio because i have a thing for Latina women…If you look at the top 20 babes rated by your members….14 are natural were only 6 are silicone babes…Hell Karina hart has had the 1# spot almost the whole year. That should say something about the members Taste…Just something to think about.. 😉
Point taken, Dave, and I did carefully read your comments. I got the impression though that both you and Elliot are implying that you believe there is something drastically going wrong with the voting. I don’t think the voting is confusing, and just wanted to emphasise that.
FrankNZ, you might want to re-read my comments: “Jim K. makes an interesting point about people mistakenly voting for their favorites, but I don’t think it’s valid…Admittedly, this was a concern of ours from the outset–that the voting might be confusing–but it hasn’t turned out that way.”
Why are you trying to suggest that we have not understood the rules? Are the results thus far so shocking to you? I think the voting perfectly reflects that a lot of us Scorelanders prefer our women all-natural, whether stacked-and-packed or slim-and-stacked. It is as simple as that. I would consider the voting so far as an interesting bit of market research for SCORE magazine in particular.
I agree with kh. I voted for the least favorite girls i like and vote for my favorite’s later. I love real breasted woman. I’m a V-man!!!!;)
The voting really isn’t that hard to get. It’s been going just the way I’ve hoped, honestly. (Sorry, augmented-girl fans . . . I like ’em natural and natural only.)
Here are some comments received from Scoreland members.
From Sam in Maryland: “Oh, puleeze..Morgan Leigh as #96? She belongs in the top 10! Are my fellow Score members a bunch of medium-sized breast fanatics?? Next thing you know, Vixen LaMoore will be one of the next 15.”
From Jim K: “TOP 100 is going all wrong! This can’t be right, Annina, Morgan Leigh, and Danielle Derek are ranked in the LOW 90’s. This is ridiculous! I don’t think people have read the rules, I think everyday they are voting for their favorite. You guys at score made this thing a little complicated and too big of a selection. Leave it to people in Florida to make a voting process complicated and misleading. Actually the rules are simple but you guys do realize that Americans (especially horny ones) can’t take too much time to read rules when there are a bunch of pictures of topless girls with big tits. You should just have everyone vote for their favorite model just once and then you guys rank them…that’s it. After this shamble of a contest is over let’s get the
former Secretary of State of Florida, Katherine Harris to make the final say. I hope I don’t have to take this to the supreme court ;-)”
Jim K. makes an interesting point about people mistakenly voting for their favorites, but I don’t think it’s valid. Here’s what I said to him: “From looking at the total voting, members don’t seem to be voting for their favorites. I think some are, but it’s a very small minority. How else can you explain that Karina Hart, Christy Marks, Merilyn Sakova and Crystal Gunns are getting very few votes (almost none on some days)? I guess I’m saying that it defies logic that members are mistakenly voting for their favorites: If that was true, then only the Morgan Leigh fans were voting for their favorites on that day? Impossible. Admittedly, this was a concern of ours from the outset–that the voting might be confusing–but it hasn’t turned out that way.”
Sorry if I’m carrying on about this a bit too much, but we were hoping for an interesting contest, and we’re definitely getting one!
Annina is #95 as the voters continue to eliminate the slim-n-stacked girls. Who will go next? Cindy Cupps? Vixen LaMoore? Daphne Rosen? None of these girls are safe…except for Crystal Gunns, who isn’t getting many votes at all.
Now, I have a question: Karina Hart, Merilyn Sakova and Christy Marks all got votes yesterday. Now, I can understand if these girls aren’t a guy’s favorites (we all have different opinions about women) but No. 95? Either these guys 1.) Have different taste from 99% of the men on Scoreland or 2.) They don’t understand the voting.
Guys, we’re eliminating girls. Don’t vote for your favorites! Vote for the girls who you DON’T want to win. Think of this as the TV show Survivor. We’re voting girls off the island!
I think Morgan is amazing, I’m all for her getting her boobs made bigger, she has a fantastic look!
I didn’t realize that morgan being voted 96 was going to stun elliot and dave like this…Wow..