Girls You Fuck vs. Girls You Keep Around

June 7, 2010 by Maria

I want to talk about something that I spoke about with a couple of guy friends recently. We spoke about chicks (Like we always do.) and how there are two categories of women in the world. We call them the Maryannes and the Gingers. You know…the kind of girls you take home to mom versus the ones you take home to fuck. Sometimes I refer to them as Keepers and Sleepers, sometimes.

Regardless of what you call them, the basic principles are the same. There are some girls that are sweet as honey and essentially, “Nice” girls. And some are horny as hell and “Bad” girls.

Now don’t get me wrong…they’re both awesome. The nice girl will make you baked goods and worry about you when you are sick and all that nice-girl jazz. But the bad girl won’t do any of that. The only thing she will ever take care of is your cock and balls. But hey, that’s its own kind of excellence.

You see, I love both types of women, equally. The Maryannes of the world hold their own charms for me. I like a sweet girl. If you were to ask me to give you an example of a nice girl in SCORELAND, I would point out girls like Lorna Morgan, Kerry Marie and Anna Song. These girls never did XXX and yet, they are smokin’ hot. The kind of girl you would take on a few dates.

Then there are the Gingers of the world. The bad girls who only know how to be good…at fucking. This girls do it all. They will fuck you on the first date. Hell, they will fuck you before you get into the restaurant on the first date. I think of ladies like Gianna Rossi and Dominno when I think of  these kinds of hellcats. The kind of girl who will ask you to spit on her pussy and finger it…in a public place!

Both girls hold a special place in my heart because sometimes you want to spoon and sometimes you want to fork. I like my nice girls and my bad girls with as much horny fervor as I can muster. But my guy friends say I can only choose one side. But how can I choose? I mean, how could anyone? But According to my friends, guys have an ultimate preference. Like the Highlander, when it comes to good girls and bad girls, there can only be one.

What is your take on it, boob lovers?

-Maria

Tags: , , , , , ,

Categories: ,

10 responses to “Girls You Fuck vs. Girls You Keep Around”

  1. viggo says:

    @Maria: I simmered down as soon as I read that Angela said that
    no girl is ever out of anyones league 🙂
    (Think i might move to Australia)

  2. Maria says:

    I think everyone is taking it to a level of good/bad that was not intended. Do I think that saying a girl is a bad girl makes her, well, bad? Not at all. I am just saying that she enjoys being wild, likes to have sex and makes no apologies. I applaud that. I am not judging anyone. I also don’t think I am focusing on anything negative. If a model does hardcore or if she doesn’t, is not the bar by which I judge her on a personal level.
    I think everyone needs to simmer down.
    I am not making fun or attacking any one of these girls. It’s a matter of personal preference. Do you like your girls sweet or do you like your girls slutty.
    For all intents and purposes, I actually prefer slutty girls. 🙂
    They don’t get offended as easily.

  3. Dave says:

    I don’t think we’re saying they’re bad when they do hardcore. We’re saying they’re doing something good girls usually don’t do. They’re behaving like bad girls.

    I also think it goes without saying that if fucking on camera was considered to be a “good girl” thing to do, it wouldn’t be nearly as enticing or exciting. Part of the excitement of porn, for me, is that these girls are doing something they’re not supposed to be doing. And when a good girl does that, it’s even better.

    If fucking on camera was common, it wouldn’t be interesting. If women walked around topless in public, then seeing them topless would no longer be exciting. There’s no humorous intent here. It’s a matter of fantasy and playing upon what gets us excited.–Dave

  4. Angela White says:

    I give a big ‘WOAH!’ to this post!

    The madonna/whore divide is used to keep women’s sexuality ‘in check’. I will leave it at that lest I go on a feminist tirade.

    I’m with Dennis here.

    P.S. Dennis, in the end there are no girls that are out of anyone’s league. Models are just normal girls, honestly!

  5. Anthony says:

    99% of bad girls i ever did bad things with were flat chested.
    and the BIG BOOB girls who i wanted to bad with got sensitive and or offended.
    I did however get sensitive for a VERY BAD HUGE BOOB girl who only wanted to do bad things with me “ouch”
    but what doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger!

  6. viggo says:

    @Dennis: I totally agree with you on that very last thing you said.

  7. Dennis says:

    Ginger-or-Mary-Ann.com gives Mary Ann 71% of the vote to Ginger’s 28%. I was always a Mary Ann fan. Ginger worked to get the attention. Mary Ann didn’t. Low maintenance AND a total babe.

    So I think Gianna Rossi qualifies as a Mary Ann type.

    FWIW, I don’t like the idea of dividing the models into “good” and “bad.” They probably get enough grief for being involved in this industry anyway– no matter their level of involvement– and they probably don’t need the likes of us reinforcing that kind of negativity, no matter how humorous our intent. And we know that some of them read these posts.

    And that they’re all pretty much out of our league.

  8. Maria says:

    Once a good girl’s gone bad, she’s gone forever 🙂

  9. viggo says:

    @Anthony: when a good girl goes bad an angel looses its wings 😀

    @Maria: I would definitely go for the good girl.(so there’s no hope for the two of us ending up together ;))
    You can teach a good girl to fuck,but you can’t teach a bad girl to care about you!

  10. Anthony says:

    I think that’s the difference between the girls they will and won’t do XXX. It alludes to their personality, whether or not they are good or bad. And when a good girl goes bad, sometimes people get upset.