Whether we’re talking CCs or cup size, bigger Jessy is better

March 4, 2022 by Dave

This about-to-be-very-lucky guy can’t believe his eyes.

I’ll let you in on a little behind-the-scenes secret: For the longest time in SCORE magazine and even on SCORELAND, we avoided mentioning CCs when discussing the size of a model’s super-sized boobs. A lot of us at TSG, and I’ll include myself in that group, felt talking about CCs was too clinical, too scientific when referring to something you fantasize about and jack off to. But as we’ve learned over the years, a lot of big-boob lovers get off on that kind of stuff. They like to hear, for example, in the case of Jessy Bunny, that she had “1300ccs, and that makes me a 32K in bras.” And they’re very much going to like to hear that today at SCORELAND, Jessy does her first hardcore scene with her 2000cc mega-boobs. And she’s only 4’11” tall!

I don’t know if my feelings have changed about this. I still prefer hearing about cup size (as in, “I went from an A-cup to a K-cup,” in Jessy’s case) rather than ccs and other scientific measurements. But I also definitely see the point of view that says, “This girl pumped up her tits to 2000ccs because she wants men to jack off to her and fuck her.”

Where do you stand on the issue? Or is it not an issue to you?

Either way, that doesn’t change the fact that Jessy gets her mouth, pussy and tits fucked and the guy cums on her face and tits at the same time. And that with bigger tits, she’s better than ever. To me, that’s a fact.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: , , , ,

3 responses to “Whether we’re talking CCs or cup size, bigger Jessy is better”

  1. Rooster9 says:

    I prefer cup size. Cc”s sound a little too clinical.

  2. Matt says:

    This looks great! Any chance of Jessy progressing to doing a DP scene? Or at least spit-roasting?

  3. Bill says:

    Jessy deserves to be on the cover of the next Score Issue!! or voluptuous that will work!!!!