Rack to the future: What if the 2010s became the 1990s all over again?

February 12, 2011 by Dave
Beshine prepares to sign the XXX-cup bra that will be given away in the May 2011 issue of SCORE.

Beshine prepares to sign the XXX-cup bra that will be given away in the May 2011 issue of SCORE.

We are now 11 years removed from the 1990s, and the era of the naturally stacked model has supposedly been upon us for a long time. Sure, the occasional Crystal Gunns, Morgan Leigh, Cindy Cupps and Beshine comes along, but these days, boob men like their women naturally stacked, right?

Well, maybe not. A recent Blog poll asked, “What is your opinion about super-slim ‘n’ stacked models like Beshine?”

And while only 29% said, “I love them. Beshine is what a SCORE Girl should look like,” those 29% outnumbered the 25% who said, “I don’t like them. I prefer naturals.”

Of course, the results of last year’s “Best of the Decade” Top 100, in which no augmented models cracked the Top 20, say otherwise. But our highly unscientific poll also revealed that 28% said, “Tits are tits. The bigger the better.” So, by my count, that means 57% of those who participated in the poll are okay with the mega-stacked augmented girls.

What does all this mean? Who knows? It could mean that girls like Beshine are one-in-a-million and they’re always welcome at SCORELAND. But, as I said, they’re one-in-a-million (probably literally), and anyone who doesn’t fit the Beshine template isn’t welcome. Or it could mean, as the answer said, “tits are tits.”

Or it could mean that the poll was wholly unscientific and completely meaningless.

What do you think? I mean, you told us already, but we need details. I’m just wondering: Does the era of the mega-stacked SCORE Girl merely seem to be over because there just aren’t many of them. If they started flooding back–if a new generation of girls like SaRenna Lee, Tiffany Towers and Angelique suddenly appeared–would you welcome them with open arms and hard cocks?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: ,

16 responses to “Rack to the future: What if the 2010s became the 1990s all over again?”

  1. belover says:

    Thank GOD. I actually stopped buying Score when it turned into the same mag as Voluptuous. The reason only 25% said they love big, fake tits is that nobody was around to take the poll….we’ve all gone to Chelsea, Beshine, and Vixen’s sites…there’s room in Score for everyone, but its the rare natural that isn’t fat, too. I miss Tiffany Towers and Sarenna, and May, 2011 will be the first issue of Score I buy in a loooong time.

  2. Arch says:

    Yes i would have to say I enjoy both.tits r tits as long as they’re big.I like big natural tits alot cause they r real soft and feel good. It’s good to know that girl naturally blessed, so u know theyll be there for life. Unless they get a reduction which dissapoints me.fake tits r just as enjoyable.some boobjobs r real nice and can’t even tell theyre enhanced,however there r some manmade racks that r not very nice to look at.some r just oddly shaped which is hard to find arousing.just like some natural racks aren’t that hot looking. To find a girl with a nice pair of big natural tits is a blessing and sometimes rare.some naturals look as though they’ve been augmentated but arent r a rare treat.like bea floraher tits r so firm they look fake but aren’t .that’s amazing.it relly don’t matter as long as they’re descent looking or alluring.like beshine they’re kinda out there,but that’s kinda of arousing besides that she has other ASSetts.

  3. Roger says:

    My first favorite model was TracI ToppS (remember that she used to capitalize her name that way, and I have always been a fan of other enhanced models like Maxi Mounds, Kayla Kleevage, Minka and Chelsea Charms. I have kept many of the back issues from those days while I tend to discard more recent issues after a few cums.

  4. Elliot James says:

    Hi JP

    There are very few websites that offer so many ways for members to send in their feedback like we do. Most sites don’t seem especially interested in that. There’s this Blog, the Scorecard letter section is over ten years old, there’s the new comment section at the bottom of every posting, plus all the other feedback devices you mention. We’re always interested in what everyone has to say. And since a lot of people are not emailers or commenters in general, the polls, ratings and contests are another way for them to let us know their opinions.

  5. JP says:

    My favorite girls are like Beshine–and believe me, I think she is incredible. When I started reading SCORE in the 90’s, these girls were the majority (Wendy Whoppers, Busty Dusty, Lisa Chest, Casey James, Traci Topps, etc.)

    Over the years I have missed these girls, as they were the norm for the magazine when SCORE was founded. Naturally big-busted girls are nice, but most of them (unless they are MEGA-BUSTY, like Christina Millan, Europe DiChan, or Renee Ross) just don’t provide me with the excitement that girls of the above caliber do. But everyone is right about one thing: Tits are tits!

    I look forward to the time when girls like Beshine, Maxi Mounds, Chelsea Charms, Keisha Evans, and Kayla Kleevage are the most prominent ones in SCORE again.

    PS–I think SCORE’s website uses too many polls, votings, ratings, etc. I think they can be easily manipulated and just confuse everyone, including the editors. I’m not saying they are worthless, they are just relied on too heavily.

  6. Dave says:

    C.A.: Beshine is in the May 2011 SCORE, on-sale Feb. 22.

  7. c.a. united kingdom says:

    talking of beshine when do we see her in score??????

  8. c.a. united kingdom says:

    ps dave, on a random note whats going on with faith,kristi klenot and taylor stevens?? i miss them in score

  9. Jack says:

    Hi Dave,

    An interesting topic, and one that (once again) requires some more discussion / feedback from readers. I thought this issue was like the mega-busty SCORE gals of the 90’s -past and gone. Howver, the recent survey results and the popularity of Beshine, seem to indicate that there is a significant group of readers who either prefer an anhanced model or think “tits are tits”.

    It may be related to the somewhat to the age of your readers. As a long time reader, I fondly remember the mega-stacked gals of SCORE in the 90’s, I appreciate the recent crop of enhanced busted ladies like Morgan Leigh, Alena Snow, Crystal Gunns and Beshine. The era seems to be over since there are not many enhanced models.

    Score has turned to the all natural model, formerly the focus of Voluptuous with some confusion with larger natural models (not slender and busty) in Score as shown by the Ashley Sage debate.

    I really do enjoy the spectacular natural models in Score today partcularily Marilyn, Karina, Christy Marks and most recently – Valory. I just think we should have room to apprecaite both – that is “tits are tits”.

    Hope this persepctive helps, I would be interested to hear from other long time readers and new readers on this topic.

  10. c.a. united kingdom says:

    yes,yes,yes, im old school and slim hot babes with huge fuck off sillicone titties are the one for me. pandora peaks,minka,kayla are some of the best and i want that whole 90s thing back again. whats your view dave? could it make a comeback…..

  11. Mark says:

    Dave,

    I just can’t go there. I think one of the reasons augmented stars were so popular is that natural girls were harder to find. Global outreach has certainly improved success in finding new natural talent, and social climates concerning public nudity continue to soften, so more natural girls are willing to show us their assets.

    I could digress into discussions about the improvements in natural breast enhancement and the lack thereof with regard to surgical augmentation, but that’s for another discussion.

    I for one simply prefer the motion and feel of natural breasts. I like to watch a naturally busty woman walk toward me fully clothed…even that slight juggle is a turn on, much less the full bounce I see above me during a cowgirl ride (or during a Christy Marks topless horseback ride or a jumping jacks workout – WOW). An enhanced girl doing those same activities just doesn’t have the same effect.

    Politics has shown us that statistics can be manipulated to say anything, but the proliferation of naturally busty girls on the web seems to indicate the natural era is here to stay…at least for now.

    I can appreciate an augmented beauty, but a natural girl will turn my head first every time…and not just the one on my shoulders.

  12. Phil Green says:

    If a girl wants to augment herself in order to please boob-men like me, then I’m flattered and grateful she wants to do it for my gratification. Chelsea, Beshine and others are just beautiful, because they have augmented themselves for ME.
    I’d welcome a return to the slim & stacked blonde era; Justa Dream et al are still a visions of lovliness.

  13. dairymanbig says:

    Please… more models who are super stacked with silicone like Beshine!

  14. J.D. says:

    It’s not even a matter of whether or not they would be welcomed back. I’m sure there’s more than enough room for all these hot women (two mags dedicated to tits, bases covered). Those who are adamant about their preference have a choice, and those who love both get a feast, there’s simply no downside here. Keep in mind, it’s harder to find augmented models simply because they don’t have the fortune of being born with a big beautiful pair of breasts. It’s a choice that requires major change and major cost. I’ve been a fan since the late 90’s, and as far as I’m concerned, as long as big boobs don’t go extinct, I’m a happy camper.

  15. RoosterCL says:

    In regards to the last paragraph, those models are some of my favorites. More models like them would definitely be welcome.

  16. kh says:

    I’m part of the 25%. I’m sure Beshine’s sweet and all, but I really hope that girls like her don’t become the norm in the SCORE publications. Immediate boner-killer. 🙁